Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 17:56:34 02/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2000 at 11:16:18, Ed Schröder wrote: >Say Rebel has to play a 6-game match on 40/2h and I have the freedom to >choose the opponent: > >Hoffmann >Seirawan >Karpov >Timman > >my order would be: > >Timman >Karpov >Hoffmann >Seirawan > >IMO Rebel would have (a lot) better chances against Karpov than against >Seirawan. > >Source of information: having played against them. > >ELO is not the connection here, the ability to play computers is. Some >know how to, some don't. Yet.... > >Ed Uh-oh, are you sure you want to sound that much like Bob? ;-) I think that the generation that developed into strong players recently had some benefit from reasonably strong machines on their way up. e.g. take Kamsky, or Leko. They seem to grit their teeth and refuse to lose. Isn't that awfully computer-like? :-) And the young English GMs... I don't think they know what "positional chess" is! They are big, fat, walking tactics! Perhaps their abilities have been honed by all of the ugly but strong moves that machines sometimes play. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.