Author: m.d.hurd
Date: 07:29:49 02/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 04, 2000 at 15:35:31, Chessfun wrote: >On February 04, 2000 at 15:12:01, m.d.hurd wrote: > >>On February 04, 2000 at 09:20:00, Chessfun wrote: >> >>> >>>Current standings after 73/100 games. >>>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999/ >>>Thanks. >> >>I have also just finished a nunn match between fritz 6a v junior 6a score >>11 - 9 to fritz, same processor as yours 433 mhz celeron and 32 mb hash >>each engine. 25 mins per game. >> >>Regards >> >>Mike > >Totally possible. >I would not expect to get repeat reults either if I ran it again. >I got 10.5 - 9.5 to Junior in the specific match I ran for posting. >In the past with F5.32 and H7.32 I ran about 10 identical nunn >match settings getting different results a lot of the time. >With F6 new and J6a I have only run the one set. >I was going to wait to post all pgn's at my site but those Junior 6a's >are a way from complete as the current 40'/40 is only at about game 76. >So I will post them there when I get home. >Thanks. Interesting stuff, assuming two programs only play their best moves, then why should they vary and if they do as appears to be the case then by how much would they be expected to vary by I wonder. Perhaps I shall play 10 rounds of 20 games using nunn positions at say blitz 5mins and see how much they vary by. Regards Mike
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.