Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:46:00 02/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2000 at 10:29:49, m.d.hurd wrote:
>On February 04, 2000 at 15:35:31, Chessfun wrote:
>
>>On February 04, 2000 at 15:12:01, m.d.hurd wrote:
>>
>>>On February 04, 2000 at 09:20:00, Chessfun wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Current standings after 73/100 games.
>>>>http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999/
>>>>Thanks.
>>>
>>>I have also just finished a nunn match between fritz 6a v junior 6a score
>>>11 - 9 to fritz, same processor as yours 433 mhz celeron and 32 mb hash
>>>each engine. 25 mins per game.
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>
>>>Mike
>>
>>Totally possible.
>>I would not expect to get repeat reults either if I ran it again.
>>I got 10.5 - 9.5 to Junior in the specific match I ran for posting.
>>In the past with F5.32 and H7.32 I ran about 10 identical nunn
>>match settings getting different results a lot of the time.
>>With F6 new and J6a I have only run the one set.
>>I was going to wait to post all pgn's at my site but those Junior 6a's
>>are a way from complete as the current 40'/40 is only at about game 76.
>>So I will post them there when I get home.
>>Thanks.
>
>Interesting stuff, assuming two programs only play their best moves, then why
>should they vary and if they do as appears to be the case then by how much would
>they be expected to vary by I wonder.
>
>Perhaps I shall play 10 rounds of 20 games using nunn positions at say blitz
>5mins and see how much they vary by.
>
>Regards
>
>Mike
Mike,
E-mail me your games from your 25 min nunn F6a v J6a match,
mine are posted for download if you want to see them.
The 40'/40 is still running Current standings after 84/100 games.
http://www.geocities.com/chessfun_1999/
Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.