Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:10:06 02/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2000 at 16:40:24, Amir Ban wrote: >On February 05, 2000 at 15:44:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On February 05, 2000 at 13:31:16, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>On February 05, 2000 at 13:27:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>> >>>>considered "abusive". Nothing more, nothing less. The censor was removed >>>>well before game time. As is easily verifiable by asking anyone there. I >>>>did not remove my +censor ban because I didn't realize I had done it myself, >>>>but that was _also_ removed prior to 11am when I discovered it. >>> >>>Even though you used small words, I still don't understand. >>> >>>Did you or did you not remove the censor? >>> >>>Your paragraph here makes no sense. >>> >>>-Tom >> >> >>Sorry... I was interrupted several times with my son working on his car. There >>was an extra "not" inserted. I _did_ remove the +censor on the crafty account >>at 10:45 am. I removed the +censor from _my_ account (hyatt) about 10:55 >>after someone suggested that might be why I didn't see Amir's comment... >> >>The above post seems to say anything _but_ that... this paragraph >>is correct. > >You removed the censor to crafty after I had gone public on ch 164 saying my >opponent is censoring me. You later removed the other censor when someone on the >channel suggested it. > >Amir when I removed the censor, _nothing_ had gone public. I didn't see your comments. I was busy trying to get two people to stop matching crafty so I could get it ready for the game with you. Feel free to put any spin on the thing you want. The censor was _definitely_ removed before the start of the round. By my timekeeping, it was removed between 10:45 and 10:46. The new ICC log, created after I restarted my auto-logon script, is dated at 10:46 my time (CST). It was started _immediately_ after I removed the censor from crafty's list. How close that happened to "your going public" I don't know, because I wasn't paying attention to 164 at the time. There were plenty of people on chan 164 that were aware of the problem, _and_ the fix, way before 11am. We were discussing alternatives at 10:50. I don't see what any of this has to do with anything. I pointed out I had forgotten about the censor. I fixed it as soon as I discovered it. If you don't like my censoring you, fine. I don't like your accusing me of intentionally writing a program that behaves abusively on purpose. Seems to me we are _both_ unhappy. Which, in a way, seems fair. Live with it. Recall that I didn't accuse you of _anything_.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.