Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:26:55 02/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 05, 2000 at 21:06:15, Peter Kasinski wrote: >I think that Bob made an unfortunate oversight by not straightening this >"censor" business in time for the tournament (i.e. he was late days not >minutes). There I disagree. The "censor" was for a purpose. The "reason" didn't disappear "days before the tournament". The "censor" will stand _after_ the tournament. I don't take accusations of misconduct lightly, now, back three months ago, nor will I take them lightly in the future. I don't censor to disrupt a tournament. I censor to show that I strongly disagree with the person that made the accusation. I think it funny that _I_ was wrong for censoring him, but he doesn't think he was wrong when he made about the most idiotic statement ever made here (and directed toward me.) After witnessing today's claims/counter-claims/etc, I only wish we had a '+censor' option for CCC. I would exercise _that_ as well. :) And that?s regardless of its genesis. I understand how Amir must have >felt. Unfortunately, for all his contribution to computer chess (who else is >there? ) Bob isn?t exactly a sweetheart at times. > >But what?s really disturbing is a bunch of postings here from adolescent would >be moderators trying to give either one of them lessons in good manners. > >PK
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.