Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Embarrassment

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 22:21:23 02/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 05, 2000 at 23:26:55, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On February 05, 2000 at 21:06:15, Peter Kasinski wrote:
>
>>I think that Bob made an unfortunate oversight by not straightening this
>>"censor" business in time for the tournament (i.e. he was late days not
>>minutes).
>
>There I disagree.  The "censor" was for a purpose.  The "reason" didn't
>disappear "days before the tournament".  The "censor" will stand _after_
>the tournament.  I don't take accusations of misconduct lightly, now, back
>three months ago, nor will I take them lightly in the future.

>I don't censor to disrupt a tournament.

You managed anyway. The censor was there while it should have not.

Ed

>I censor to show that I strongly disagree
>with the person that made the accusation.  I think it funny that _I_ was
>wrong for censoring him, but he doesn't think he was wrong when he made
>about the most idiotic statement ever made here (and directed toward me.)
>
>After witnessing today's claims/counter-claims/etc, I only wish we had a
>'+censor' option for CCC.  I would exercise _that_ as well.  :)
>
>
>
>
> And that?s regardless of its genesis. I understand how Amir must have
>>felt. Unfortunately, for all his contribution to computer chess (who else is
>>there? ) Bob isn?t exactly a sweetheart at times.
>>
>>But what?s really disturbing is a bunch of postings here from adolescent would
>>be moderators trying to give either one of them lessons in good manners.
>>
>>PK



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.