Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The ROUND 5

Author: Wayne Lowrance

Date: 23:37:04 02/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 05, 2000 at 21:20:55, Steve Lim wrote:

>This post will hopefully clear up some opinions about what actually happened in
>round 5.
>
>#1 McRiley will no longer be able to run the tournament for the foreseeable
>future. He will also not have internet access as far as I know. As such, I have
>taken over as TD for the CCT for rounds 5/6. I intend to continue as TD for
>rounds 7/8 if there are no violent objections. I have also acquired the pairing
>software used by USCF. I will also run the GnuChess account from my 450mhz to
>keep the pairings even.
>
>#2 Because I was unaware of McRiley's plight, I was only able to take over there
>and then. I apologize for this on behalf of ICC. Since it has alot to do with
>the delay and the mix up as discussed below (#3).
>
>#3 When I logged in I quickly learned about the situation concerning crafty(C)
>and ban(C). All of this happened after I arrived unfortunately.

That is great that Amir is back in! Can I assume that the tourney will be re
shuffled somehow bringing Amir back in and would that mean that Amir and Crafty
will meet. I am a little confused about the mechanics !

>
>a) Crafty has been censoring ban for while now based on some personal dispute
>that is of no relevance to the tourney.
>
>    Hyatt tells you: at 11:45 crafty was playing diepx...  I was involved in
>stopping that, and discovered the censor...
>
>    Hyatt tells you: someone reported at 11:50 that "crafty is censoring ban, so
>he said he is not playing and left".
>
>    Hyatt tells you: I immediately responded "I just fixed that problem.."
>
>You get an idea of what happened just from the above. Also note that since Hyatt
>himself had a censor in his personal account, he missed any tells from ban both
>in person and to the channel.
>
>I later spoke with Amir regarding the whole situation.
>
>It is important to note that Amir chose to leave, he was _not_ kicked out of the
>tourney as I have seen some people say.
>
>He told me that in a conversation with Bruce (ferret) that he wanted one of 2
>things. #1 Bob to apologize on CCC or #2 That he forfeit and Crafty would get a
>technical win.
>
>#2 Would have happened. However, the general feeling was that it would be unfair
>to let the leader (crafty) get a full point for nothing. So a re-pairing was
>done for round 5.
>
>Note that Amir never said he was quiting the entire tourney explicitly, he felt
>insulted by even having to bring up the fact that his opponent was censoring him
>and so chose to leave.
>
>Here, I must point out that he tried to contact McRiley who was the TD to
>explain the situation. Since McRiley was not logged in, it was obviously very
>frustrating. I must again apologize on behalf of ICC for a TD not being present.
>It should be clear that Amir should not be expected to sort out problems with
>censors and formulas etc. It is up to the TD to notify all parties involved.
>
>Amir has since agreed to continue with the tourney, which I think is wonderful.
>Also, as I mentioned before, GnuChess is back too.
>
>I hope this has cleared up some things, and I look forward to last few rounds.
>I do hope that we can have more of these tourneys. Best of luck to all.
>
>thanks for your time,
>
>Steve Lim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.