Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 06:55:06 02/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2000 at 09:23:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 06, 2000 at 01:21:23, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On February 05, 2000 at 23:26:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On February 05, 2000 at 21:06:15, Peter Kasinski wrote: >>> >>>>I think that Bob made an unfortunate oversight by not straightening this >>>>"censor" business in time for the tournament (i.e. he was late days not >>>>minutes). >>> >>>There I disagree. The "censor" was for a purpose. The "reason" didn't >>>disappear "days before the tournament". The "censor" will stand _after_ >>>the tournament. I don't take accusations of misconduct lightly, now, back >>>three months ago, nor will I take them lightly in the future. >> >>>I don't censor to disrupt a tournament. >> >>You managed anyway. The censor was there while it should have not. >> >>Ed > >A. A censor list is _mine_ to control, _not_ yours. I censor when/who I >choose, and that is my decision, not yours. The censor was removed _prior_ >to the start of the round, at least 10 minutes prior to in fact. _I_ didn't >disrupt the event. > >B. I don't see what your one-liner offers to the discussion, either. I don't like people being lynched. When this occurs I tend to point out the "+" points of the lynched party as nothing happens for no reason. In case you don't understand my point, I will do the very same in case the opposite will happen to you. It just ain't right, double period. Ed >> >>>I censor to show that I strongly disagree >>>with the person that made the accusation. I think it funny that _I_ was >>>wrong for censoring him, but he doesn't think he was wrong when he made >>>about the most idiotic statement ever made here (and directed toward me.) >>> >>>After witnessing today's claims/counter-claims/etc, I only wish we had a >>>'+censor' option for CCC. I would exercise _that_ as well. :) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> And that?s regardless of its genesis. I understand how Amir must have >>>>felt. Unfortunately, for all his contribution to computer chess (who else is >>>>there? ) Bob isn?t exactly a sweetheart at times. >>>> >>>>But what?s really disturbing is a bunch of postings here from adolescent would >>>>be moderators trying to give either one of them lessons in good manners. >>>> >>>>PK
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.