Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:27:16 02/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2000 at 10:04:11, jonathon smith wrote: >On February 06, 2000 at 09:55:06, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On February 06, 2000 at 09:23:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On February 06, 2000 at 01:21:23, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On February 05, 2000 at 23:26:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 05, 2000 at 21:06:15, Peter Kasinski wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I think that Bob made an unfortunate oversight by not straightening this >>>>>>"censor" business in time for the tournament (i.e. he was late days not >>>>>>minutes). >>>>> >>>>>There I disagree. The "censor" was for a purpose. The "reason" didn't >>>>>disappear "days before the tournament". The "censor" will stand _after_ >>>>>the tournament. I don't take accusations of misconduct lightly, now, back >>>>>three months ago, nor will I take them lightly in the future. >>>> >>>>>I don't censor to disrupt a tournament. >>>> >>>>You managed anyway. The censor was there while it should have not. >>>> >>>>Ed >>> >>>A. A censor list is _mine_ to control, _not_ yours. I censor when/who I >>>choose, and that is my decision, not yours. The censor was removed _prior_ >>>to the start of the round, at least 10 minutes prior to in fact. _I_ didn't >>>disrupt the event. >>> >>>B. I don't see what your one-liner offers to the discussion, either. >> >>I don't like people being lynched. When this occurs I tend to point out >>the "+" points of the lynched party as nothing happens for no reason. In >>case you don't understand my point, I will do the very same in case the >>opposite will happen to you. It just ain't right, double period. >> >>Ed >> > >ChrisW told me that this comment is hypocritical. Mr Schroder has engaged in a >ex-legal lynching himself in the case of ChrisW who was 'lynched' from the CCC >even though he had not posted into the CCC for five months. I am going to write the moderators, asking that this accound be banned. If you want to post, use your real name. We know who you are. This third-party schizo stuff was funny for a bit, but now it is just drudgery... > > >> >> >>>> >>>>>I censor to show that I strongly disagree >>>>>with the person that made the accusation. I think it funny that _I_ was >>>>>wrong for censoring him, but he doesn't think he was wrong when he made >>>>>about the most idiotic statement ever made here (and directed toward me.) >>>>> >>>>>After witnessing today's claims/counter-claims/etc, I only wish we had a >>>>>'+censor' option for CCC. I would exercise _that_ as well. :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> And that?s regardless of its genesis. I understand how Amir must have >>>>>>felt. Unfortunately, for all his contribution to computer chess (who else is >>>>>>there? ) Bob isn?t exactly a sweetheart at times. >>>>>> >>>>>>But what?s really disturbing is a bunch of postings here from adolescent would >>>>>>be moderators trying to give either one of them lessons in good manners. >>>>>> >>>>>>PK
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.