Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 09:25:58 02/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2000 at 10:51:23, jonathon smith wrote: >On February 06, 2000 at 10:36:31, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On February 06, 2000 at 10:04:11, jonathon smith wrote: >> >>>On February 06, 2000 at 09:55:06, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On February 06, 2000 at 09:23:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 06, 2000 at 01:21:23, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 05, 2000 at 23:26:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On February 05, 2000 at 21:06:15, Peter Kasinski wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I think that Bob made an unfortunate oversight by not straightening this >>>>>>>>"censor" business in time for the tournament (i.e. he was late days not >>>>>>>>minutes). >>>>>>> >>>>>>>There I disagree. The "censor" was for a purpose. The "reason" didn't >>>>>>>disappear "days before the tournament". The "censor" will stand _after_ >>>>>>>the tournament. I don't take accusations of misconduct lightly, now, back >>>>>>>three months ago, nor will I take them lightly in the future. >>>>>> >>>>>>>I don't censor to disrupt a tournament. >>>>>> >>>>>>You managed anyway. The censor was there while it should have not. >>>>>> >>>>>>Ed >>>>> >>>>>A. A censor list is _mine_ to control, _not_ yours. I censor when/who I >>>>>choose, and that is my decision, not yours. The censor was removed _prior_ >>>>>to the start of the round, at least 10 minutes prior to in fact. _I_ didn't >>>>>disrupt the event. >>>>> >>>>>B. I don't see what your one-liner offers to the discussion, either. >>>> >>>>I don't like people being lynched. When this occurs I tend to point out >>>>the "+" points of the lynched party as nothing happens for no reason. In >>>>case you don't understand my point, I will do the very same in case the >>>>opposite will happen to you. It just ain't right, double period. >>>> >>>>Ed >>>> >>> >>>ChrisW told me that this comment is hypocritical. Mr Schroder has engaged in a >>>ex-legal lynching himself in the case of ChrisW who was 'lynched' from the CCC >>>even though he had not posted into the CCC for five months. >> >>Wrong. When moderators, or in your case the founders, give the red card to >>someone and is banned from CCC, there is no lynching. > >Banners Endlessly Lying Loudly Afterwards, by Hyatt, Frickenschmidt and yourself >was the "lynching". Or as Mr Moreland described it as a "Kafkaesque Torture". > >Further your contract with ICD compromised your position. You cannot claim to >have been acting with pure motives. Hence the hypocracy. This sub-thread is over. bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.