Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: MODERATION: Why were these harmless posts censored ?

Author: jonathon smith

Date: 09:41:31 02/06/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 06, 2000 at 12:13:08, Bruce Moreland wrote:

>
>On February 06, 2000 at 06:10:47, jonathon smith wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>This is a request for information. I posted several posts yesterday. Several of
>>which were censored. I have managed to recover three of the censored postings. I
>>am quite unable to understand why these posts were removed. They seem harmless
>>to me, and certainly far less problematical than many posts I can see in place.
>
>http://209.35.185.19/ccc/message.html?94953
>
>That explains why I deleted the posts.  I didn't have email yesterday so I
>didn't tell everyone about the posts I deleted.  I don't have it today, either.
>

ChrsiW told me that this is not accurate.

1. Re: Junior forfeits to Crafty! - Enrique Irazoqui 12:48:34 2/05/2000 (2)
2. Re: Junior forfeits to Crafty! - jonathon smith 13:21:17 2/05/2000 (3)
4. Re:   Junior forfeits to Crafty! - Enrique Irazoqui 15:28:43 2/05/2000 (3)
5. Re: Junior forfeits to Crafty! - jonathon smith 16:23:21 2/05/2000 (0)
3. Moderation: This thread is not about Chris - Bruce Moreland 13:34:39
2/05/2000 (0)

Mr Moreland applied the "moderation" post (3) at 13:34. This post told members
not to post to this thread.

ChrisW sais that he saw your moderation message and did not post.

At 15:28 (2 hours later) Mr Enrique made an attack post replying "Who cares" to
the post that Mr Moreland said was not to be posted to.

ChrisW replied to that post Of Mr Enrique 1 hour later.

Mr Moreland then deleted this reply.

An even policy, that was in accord with Mr Moreland's "moderation" post would
have been to delete Mr Enrique's post. But this was not done.


>You weren't a participant in the ICC tournament, and I figured that you were
>simply out to stir up trouble, same as today.
>
>bruce

ChrisW told me that to describe the exponentiation of someone elses strongly
held views as "stirring up trouble" is an act of taking sides and merely an
opinion. In his opinion, yours is a biased and pre-processed opinion.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.