Author: jonathon smith
Date: 11:24:15 02/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2000 at 14:22:36, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 06, 2000 at 12:24:33, jonathon smith wrote: > >>On February 06, 2000 at 10:27:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On February 06, 2000 at 10:04:11, jonathon smith wrote: >>> >>>>On February 06, 2000 at 09:55:06, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 06, 2000 at 09:23:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On February 06, 2000 at 01:21:23, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On February 05, 2000 at 23:26:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On February 05, 2000 at 21:06:15, Peter Kasinski wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>I think that Bob made an unfortunate oversight by not straightening this >>>>>>>>>"censor" business in time for the tournament (i.e. he was late days not >>>>>>>>>minutes). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>There I disagree. The "censor" was for a purpose. The "reason" didn't >>>>>>>>disappear "days before the tournament". The "censor" will stand _after_ >>>>>>>>the tournament. I don't take accusations of misconduct lightly, now, back >>>>>>>>three months ago, nor will I take them lightly in the future. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I don't censor to disrupt a tournament. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>You managed anyway. The censor was there while it should have not. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Ed >>>>>> >>>>>>A. A censor list is _mine_ to control, _not_ yours. I censor when/who I >>>>>>choose, and that is my decision, not yours. The censor was removed _prior_ >>>>>>to the start of the round, at least 10 minutes prior to in fact. _I_ didn't >>>>>>disrupt the event. >>>>>> >>>>>>B. I don't see what your one-liner offers to the discussion, either. >>>>> >>>>>I don't like people being lynched. When this occurs I tend to point out >>>>>the "+" points of the lynched party as nothing happens for no reason. In >>>>>case you don't understand my point, I will do the very same in case the >>>>>opposite will happen to you. It just ain't right, double period. >>>>> >>>>>Ed >>>>> >>>> >>>>ChrisW told me that this comment is hypocritical. Mr Schroder has engaged in a >>>>ex-legal lynching himself in the case of ChrisW who was 'lynched' from the CCC >>>>even though he had not posted into the CCC for five months. >>> >>>I am going to write the moderators, asking that this accound be banned. If >>>you want to post, use your real name. We know who you are. This third-party >>>schizo stuff was funny for a bit, but now it is just drudgery... >>> >> >>ChrisW asks are you ever wrong? >> >>Do you ever retract or apologise to anybody? >> >>If you shot someone at point blank range would it be their fault for being so >>stupid as to walk into the bullet? >> >>Are you ever at fault? >> >>Is there a charter point relating to "drudgery"? >> >>ChrisW says the last refuge of those in the wrong, who continue the wrong, and >>refuse to admit it, is to cry "boredom" or "drudgery". Or "Who cares". >> > >I have apologized for being wrong several times here. However, one of those >times I was _not_ wrong was the time I finally agreed that you should become >a part of the past, rather than the present. That decision was good, using >hindsight. > >Why don't you just post like a normal person, using a real name, and stop this >'third person' garbage? > > > > >> >> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>I censor to show that I strongly disagree >>>>>>>>with the person that made the accusation. I think it funny that _I_ was >>>>>>>>wrong for censoring him, but he doesn't think he was wrong when he made >>>>>>>>about the most idiotic statement ever made here (and directed toward me.) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>After witnessing today's claims/counter-claims/etc, I only wish we had a >>>>>>>>'+censor' option for CCC. I would exercise _that_ as well. :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And that?s regardless of its genesis. I understand how Amir must have >>>>>>>>>felt. Unfortunately, for all his contribution to computer chess (who else is >>>>>>>>>there? ) Bob isn?t exactly a sweetheart at times. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>But what?s really disturbing is a bunch of postings here from adolescent would >>>>>>>>>be moderators trying to give either one of them lessons in good manners. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>PK
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.