Author: jonathon smith
Date: 13:07:45 02/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 06, 2000 at 15:21:14, KarinsDad wrote: >On February 06, 2000 at 13:51:27, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >>On February 06, 2000 at 12:59:31, KarinsDad wrote: >> >>>On February 06, 2000 at 12:41:31, jonathon smith wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>ChrisW told me that to describe the exponentiation of someone elses strongly >>>>held views as "stirring up trouble" is an act of taking sides and merely an >>>>opinion. In his opinion, yours is a biased and pre-processed opinion. >>> >>>Who cares? >>> >>>Most of the people here do not care at all what ChrisW says in "hearsay". Any >>>hearsay from ChrisW obviously does not apply to computer chess, just creating >>>havoc at CCC, so who cares what he thinks, says, or opines? Why doesn't he just >>>keep his opinions on his own forum? >>> >>>Oh, let me guess. He will go off and sulk and then come back here with a new >>>alias and post a lot of crap for the new moderators to have to deal with. >>> >>>Oh joy. >>> >>>KarinsDad :( >> >> >>Saying that we don't care what Chris Whittington has to say directly or via his >>"spokesperson" doesn't seem frightfully constructive either to me, KarinsDad. >>Neither does calling it "a lot of crap" seem very careful phrasing. Bruce >>explained why he deleted those posts and why he could not react to Jonathon via >>e-mail. I think he was right in deleting because Chris has already exponentiated >>his own views quite clearly before and in my view, Jonathon those further posts >>did not have much relation to the Junior-Crafty issue. So at this point if I >>were moderator I would ask parties to show some restraint and wouldn't mind if >>the moderators ended this subthread. >> >>Eelco > >Yeah, maybe it's not constructive. It never is, is it? With you. Why do you produce the same tired old abuse and twisted language every time a thread has ceased? Moreland said "Stop". Which appears to be your start signal. But what you do not understand is that we >have been putting up with this stuff since we became moderators, over 7 months >of it. > >We have received on both the forum and via Email a lot of complaints about >Jonathon Smith/ChrisW. We have asked JSCW to cool it. We have asked CW via the >forum here to sign up under his own name. ChrisW told me he has not been asked anything of the sort. We have bent over backwards to >accomodate him and he thumbs his nose at us. ChrisW says he didn't notice any bending over backwards, and that the above statement is a lie. ChrisW has had zero communication from "KarinsDad". > >Use the filter mechanism to read JS's posts for the last 3 days. What a bunch of >garbage. ChrisW says that true facts were reported. He insulted Enrique, What was posted was true. James, That he is 16-17, and not equipped to deal with this mess is true. Robert, "Robert" has been corrected at times. Again with true statements. and the organizers of the >tournament in those posts. I doubt there is a computer chess related post in the >bunch. ChrisW is unable to post computer chess here, even if he wanted to, because he is banned. ChrisW was banned after he hadn't posted here for 5 months. NOBODY wants to read that crap, hence my previous message. ChrisW notes that every time there is a flame war between the egos, the anonymous moderator adds fuel to the fire with abusive comments of his own (crap). ChrisW wonders as to the motivations of the anonymous moderator. ChrisW wonders if a new incarnation of the puppetmaster of KarinsDad will appear as a new "moderator". ChrisW told me that the sad truth is that nobody knows. > >I am tired of Chris. I do not want to play nice with him anymore. ChrisW told me that he has had zero communication from "I". Therefore "I"'s statement is misleading. I want him to >either behave or go away. He has his own forum to play on. If he doesn't want to >behave here, ChrisW is banned here as a result of a flame war on rgcc. ChrisW didn't post here for 5 months before he was banned. he can misbehave there. I read ChrisW's posts on that forum. They seemed true and sensible. > >But, the people here are not going to be that lucky. > >KarinsDad :( > >PS. If you get elected moderator, then he will become your problem. Good luck! >You'll need it.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.