Author: jonathon smith
Date: 08:36:17 02/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2000 at 10:14:52, Michael Neish wrote: >On February 07, 2000 at 06:54:15, jonathon smith wrote: > >Chris, I'm sorry to reply to you when I don't know you or anything about you >except what I've read in posts yesterday and today, and a few earlier on. >And apologies too to the moderators for this very off-topic post, although >relevant to this thread. > >I just want to ask you, what are you trying to gain by raking up all this >mess time and time again? ChrisW says it is necessary to prove that truth will win out against lies. And why do you keep posting on CCC when >you have your own forum somewhere else? I just don't understand your >objectives. If you were happy to be free of CCC you wouldn't come here >at all, for better or worse. If you secretly want to come back to CCC as >ChrisW, then I think you're going the wrong way about it. > >To someone who doesn't know you (me), your behaviour seems >extraordinarily bitter and immature. All I read are continual references >to the banning incident which occurred some years ago now, and how >the moderators have a hidden agenda. And apparently you are expending >some effort in trying to gather evidence to proving the moderators >have double standards. Please learn to let things go. You >will have a longer and happier life if you do. No matter how correct >and eloquent your arguments are, are you expecting people to make a >U-turn and say "Yes Chris you were right all along, I'm so sorry this >ever happened. Let's be pals and forget the whole affair."? If not, >then what are you trying to achieve? I'm sorry, but I just don't >understand your behaviour. > >I don't know whether you were rightfully or wrongfully banned, and don't >really care. What I care about is that the topic "ChrisW" seems to be the >precursor of a series of disruptive posts which spoil my enjoyment of >this forum. I'd hazard a guess that this is the limit of what most CCC >members care about as well. Each new post of yours just gives a >stronger impression, to someone with no facts, that you were >rightfully banned after all. > >I don't know what else to say. Please lighten up man. > >Mike. > >P.S.: To the moderators, I know this violates the charter. Feel free >to delete this post if you think it should be.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.