Author: Roger
Date: 10:55:46 02/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2000 at 03:13:24, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On February 07, 2000 at 01:00:19, Pete Galati wrote: > >>On February 07, 2000 at 00:32:34, Tina Long wrote: >> >>>The trouble with jonathon smith is that he actually believes everything that >>>that Chris W tells him. >>> >>>Perhaps Chris W just fools jonathon smith occassionally! >>> >>>Tina Long >> >>Funny thing is, a few of us have told Chris that (in so many words) he should >>stop pretending his name is johnathon smith, and he never makes any effort to >>deny that he is indeed Chris Wittington, and not johnathon smith... >> >>Ok, and then Bruce Moreland says to Karensdad "Chris is banned.", so what does >>that leave us with here? >> >>Somehow it still leaves us with Chris Wittington, pretending his name is >>johnathon smith, even though we know exactly who he is, and just to further rub >>our noses in it (like we all just crapped on the floor) he talks in this 3rd >>person speak, just to make it even more obvious who he is, and that we havn't >>gotten rid of him, only banned him. >> >>Does anyone see why there's a problem here??? > >There have been several other Chris-like accounts that have been gotten rid of >after they caused a considerable stir. > >Jonathan Smith has been registered here for a very long time, but nobody has >really noticed. I was content with this situation, personally. Recently, the >account becamse much more noticeable but I didn't think it was really his fault, >and I figured that if that situation could be passed, the next group of >moderators could consider what they wanted to do with the account and what they >wanted to do with Chris. > >The past couple of days the account has caused a considerable stir. > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.