Author: Pete Galati
Date: 12:17:28 02/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2000 at 13:53:24, Roger wrote: >On February 07, 2000 at 08:17:03, Andrew R. Case wrote: > >>On February 07, 2000 at 01:08:14, Roger wrote: >> >>>On February 07, 2000 at 01:00:19, Pete Galati wrote: >>> >>>>On February 07, 2000 at 00:32:34, Tina Long wrote: >>>> >>>>>The trouble with jonathon smith is that he actually believes everything that >>>>>that Chris W tells him. >>>>> >>>>>Perhaps Chris W just fools jonathon smith occassionally! >>>>> >>>>>Tina Long >>>> >>>>Funny thing is, a few of us have told Chris that (in so many words) he should >>>>stop pretending his name is johnathon smith, and he never makes any effort to >>>>deny that he is indeed Chris Wittington, and not johnathon smith... >>>> >>>>Ok, and then Bruce Moreland says to Karensdad "Chris is banned.", so what does >>>>that leave us with here? >>>> >>>>Somehow it still leaves us with Chris Wittington, pretending his name is >>>>johnathon smith, even though we know exactly who he is, and just to further rub >>>>our noses in it (like we all just crapped on the floor) he talks in this 3rd >>>>person speak, just to make it even more obvious who he is, and that we havn't >>>>gotten rid of him, only banned him. >>>> >>>>Does anyone see why there's a problem here??? >>>> >>>>PMG tells me he's not ammused. >>>> >>>>Pete >>> >>>The moderators should follow up on this immediately and delete the Jonathan >>>Smith account. ChrisW is just another person, and doesn't deserve special >>>treatment. >>> >>>Why are the moderators not doing their job here? >>> >>>Roger >> >> Sorry Roger, but I have seen nothing but excellence from the moderators >>ever since I have been a member of CCC.This is especially amazing considering >>that all the moderators I have read about don't really want the job. >> >> Andrew R. Case > >I agree. The moderators have been great, and we owe them a big thanks for a >thanksless job. > >That said, I don't think that Mr Whittington should be allowed to compromise our >forum. You don't ban screen names or accounts, you ban persons. I realize that >this is a controversial issue, but if you espouse principles, my feeling is that >you ought to live by them. > >Roger Sort of a problem, those moderators are walking on broken glass, and Chris has these character flaws that make him enjoy bumping into them while they're doing it. One of the reasons I'd prefer not to have the mosquito like Chris clones around. And you know he's not working on improving his CS Tal program while he's spending all his time here at CCC being a pest. I mean, I know allot of people read faster, think faster, and type posts faster than I do, but lets be realistic about this. Why would he waste his time here when all he does is argue about his being banned? Waste of time, bad for his image. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.