Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:27:51 02/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2000 at 17:03:57, KarinsDad wrote: >>and chris does not like this. he wants IMO talk about computerchess. >I disagree. Last summer, YOU had a big fight with Herman Hesse over what it was like to be a German. At the time, you did not realize that you were fighting >with Chris. a) this shows that i am my own b) that we discuss when we are different opinion. you call it fight. i call it discussion. the difference is that in a fight you kill, meanwhile in a discussion you are other point of view than the other, but you do not hate the person. this is a difference. when you are only against somebodies point of view, you would not kill the person. you would fight his ideas, but thats all. >And Chris is your friend, but he did not let you know you were >fighting with him. and whats the problem ? when he believes A and i do NOT(A) than we discuss. i do discuss with anybody. even with idiots and even with my enemies. there are no tabu's :-) for discussions. > Chris LOVES to fight and create havoc. That is why he does it >here as opposed to doing it on his own forum. measuring the noise in this forum, and the fights between the programmers i register, i would say that chris seems not be the only programmer in this group who likes to fight, if it is true what you claim. or do you think these names are all faked and they are all chris ? chris has done "his forum" because i asked him to do such a forum for me. he had no chess-forum, and he was not doing chess anyhow. he did shogi. and chess was not interesting for him. i asked him if he could make me a forum like gambit-soft, because those forums have been nearly destroyed by many idiots posting anonymously bullshit, stalking arround. i wanted to have a niche for myself. where i can concentrate on posting stuff i find out without the echo of 3 or 6 posts saying idiotic stuff anonymously. >Count up the number of jonathon smith posts that you consider to be just >fighting as opposed to computer chess within the last 7 days (the limit of the >filter) and see if you can find ANY other member who has as many posts within >the last 7 days that you consider to be fighting posts. i don't read jonathan smith post very often. i do refute many threads. there is too much chaos in this group and to less sensible data. people post positions any program almost solves in blitz mode. i don't know WHY, maybe so many people do only blitz with their programs. a position should take longer to solve than to setup. look. i do not want to talk with you about jonathan smith threads. i don't read them. i don't know them. if you want talk about chris, than i can tell you a little, because i know him a little. he is no troublemaker. >And it is also amazing that you defend a person that insulted you so much last >summer. Or did you still not know that Herman Hesse was Chris? you don't get the difference between content and personal stuff, do you ? you believe somebody says NOT (a) and you will kill him for that , or ? i do differenciate between what somebody says and the person. i can attack what he says, but defend the person. no problem for me. i call this tolerance. or humanity. i have registered although that many people here do not differenciate between person and point-of-views. often you get shot because you say something against somebodies opinion. >>this here is not about computerchess. it is about who pisses >>the longest line into snow. >Then what is computer chess discussion? Please enlighten us. oh - we had this in rgcc before rolf destoyed it. >KarinsDad :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.