Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 19:26:23 02/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2000 at 14:11:51, Eelco de Groot wrote: >Thorsten, really I think you spend to much time on the Intelligent Chess Forum. >Why did you have to react this way as if you were attacked? because the thing is a major thing for me. the question about materialism and idealism. about producing senseless data or about trying to qualify something. the difference between automatic process, while you sleep (24 chessbase engines fight out a blitz tournament while you be nice to your wife) and finding out something that is not written in the chart the chessbase product generated the next day in rt-format. if computerchess would be about this, we could all auto232-conect the machines. send the programmers home and let frederic post the flip-chart. maybe this is utopia for chessfun, for me it is 1984 = anti-utopia. computerchess is not about: how can we automize it that way we don't have to participate, computerchess for me is: what can we learn out of it. and we can not learn much out of the results. the inetersting stuff is in the games. and in the situation of the 40 moves x 2 events happen during the game. and 10 games give 40x2x10 events you have to learn from. and not the 6-4 result somebody gives you and THE big information !! when i see a 10 games round in my tournament, i see 800 events. each different. when somebody posts: 6-4 this is NOT the same quality. although it is done overnight. the 6-4 over night is throwing bones in the air. like giving numbers for girls. or giving numbers for people at school. you cannot decribe a person with a number. and you cannot decribe a game of chess, nor 10 games, by a number ! >Can't you see that >some of your remarks may have offended Sarah? You put in a smiley at the end of >your post but I really think it was misplaced. Look at it again as you would as >a moderator in your own forum, don't you think you could have reacted >differently? i don't think so. when i put a smiley behind, i smile. i do not say: i do hate you. >Regards, Eelco when chessfun was hurted he/she (whatever) can say so. i have no problems apologizing. i can make mistakes. i am not data (from star trek).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.