Author: Chessfun
Date: 22:17:07 02/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 07, 2000 at 22:26:23, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 07, 2000 at 14:11:51, Eelco de Groot wrote: > >>Thorsten, really I think you spend to much time on the Intelligent Chess Forum. >>Why did you have to react this way as if you were attacked? > >because the thing is a major thing for me. >the question about materialism and idealism. about >producing senseless data or about trying to qualify something. >the difference between automatic process, while you sleep >(24 chessbase engines fight out a blitz tournament while you be nice >to your wife) and finding out something that is not written in the >chart the chessbase product generated the next day in rt-format. >if computerchess would be about this, we could all auto232-conect the machines. >send the programmers home and let frederic post the flip-chart. >maybe this is utopia for chessfun, for me it is 1984 = anti-utopia. If inplace of speaking endless babble you had taken the time to read what I had originally written you would have seen that I had said that Hiarcs was good at blitz for Michael to play that with his Chess Tiger. To which Christophe replied he thought this was a good idea. Humans play blitz, humans are rated at blitz, why not computers?. Why do we play 40 moves in 120 mins because those are the time controls set by humans. Therefore the measure is to be against humans. But what is wrong with measuring in a different way. Who are you to preach to others what is right or wrong. <snip> >when chessfun was hurted he/she (whatever) can say so. >i have no problems apologizing. i can make mistakes. >i am not data (from star trek). I am not hurt?, I am not insulted?, I just choose not to engage with you in these endless lines of text which just are a waste of others time reading them. (except maybe once per thread)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.