Author: Charles Unruh
Date: 00:42:35 02/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2000 at 03:31:21, C Morris wrote: >On February 08, 2000 at 03:14:26, Anatoli wrote: > >>Many thanks for your answer and test ! >>But unfortunately I received an e-mail from a chess friend and his Fritz DID >>crash at the move 28...c2 !? It is a bug ! >>How mant seconds did you give per move ? I gave 120 and 150. >>Best wishes >>Anatoli >> >> >> >>On February 08, 2000 at 00:38:09, C Morris wrote: >> >>>I had no problems with Fritz6a analysis in response to the problems that Anatoli >>>expressed earlier. Fritz did not freeze on move 28..c2. >>> >>>New game - Junior 6.0 >>>[Fritz 6 (45s)] >>> >>>1.e4 C17: French: 3 Nc3 Bb4 4 e5 c5 sidelines 1...e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e5 c5 >>>5.a3 Ba5 6.b4 cxd4 7.Qg4 Ne7 8.bxa5 dxc3 9.Qxg7 Rg8 10.Qxh7 Nbc6 11.Nf3 Qc7 >>>12.Bf4 [12.Bb5 Bd7 13.0-0 Nxe5 14.Nxe5 Qxe5 15.Bxd7+ Kxd7 16.Qd3 Rac8 17.Rb1 Rc7 >>>18.Be3 Nc6 19.f4 Qd6 20.Bd4 Qxa3 21.Ra1 Qb4 22.Bxc3 Qc5+ 23.Rf2 a6 24.Ra4 Kc8 >>>25.Bd2 Ne7 26.Be3 Qc6 Balashov,Y-Lputian,S/Uzhgorod 1988/TD 88\01/½-½ (60)] >>>12...Bd7 13.a6 [13.Bd3 0-0-0 14.Bg3 Qxa5 15.0-0 Rdf8 16.Qh4 Nf5 17.Bxf5 exf5 >>>18.h3 Be6 19.Rfd1 Kb8 20.Qf4 Ne7 21.Qe3 Ng6 22.Ng5 Rc8 23.Rd4 Qb6 24.Rad1 Ka8 >>>25.f4 Qb2 26.Ra4 b6 27.Bf2 Rc6 28.Qe2 Rgc8 29.g3 Rc4 30.Rxc4 Rxc4 31.h4 Qxa3 >>>32.h5 Nxf4 33.gxf4 Rxf4 34.Nxe6 fxe6 35.Qb5 Qe7 36.Qc6+ Kb8 37.Qd6+ Qxd6 38.exd6 >>>Rg4+ 39.Kf1 Rg8 40.d7 1-0 Balzar,A-Machelett,H/BL2-O 1996/BL2 (40)] 13...0-0-0N >>>[13...b6 14.Bb5 0-0-0 15.Qd3 Ng6 16.Bg3 Ncxe5 17.Bxd7+ Rxd7 18.Nxe5 Nxe5 19.Qd4 >>>f6 20.0-0 Rdg7 21.f4 Qc4 22.Qe3 d4 23.Qe4 Nc6 24.Rad1 f5 25.Qf3 Kc7 26.Rfe1 Rg6 >>>27.Qh5 R8g7 28.Qh8 Gross,D-Vanek,P/CZE-ch 1993/TD 93\10/1-0 (60)] 14.axb7+ Kb8 >>>15.Qd3 d4 16.Rb1 Rg4 17.Bg3 Nf5 18.Be2 Na5 19.0-0 Bc6 20.Rb4 Bd5 21.Rfb1 Be4 >>>22.Qd1 Nc6 23.Rb5 d3 24.cxd3 Ncd4 25.Ne1 [¹25.Nxd4 White clearly has the better >>>chances 25...Rxg3 Demolishes the pawn shield 26.dxe4²] 25...Rxg3 Demolition of >>>pawn structure 26.hxg3 [26.fxg3 Theme: Deflection from e3 26...Ne3] 26...Nxb5 >>>27.Rxb5 Nd4 28.Rb4 [Not 28.dxe4 Nxb5 29.Bd3 Qxe5µ] 28...c2 29.Nxc2 Nxe2+ 30.Qxe2 >>>Bxd3 31.Qg4 Qxc2 32.Qh4 Threatening mate... how? 32...Qc7 33.Kh2 a5 34.Rb2 Rd5 >>>35.Qh8+ Qd8 The mate threat is Qxh8 36.Qg7 Rd7 37.Qg4 Ba6 38.Qh4 Bxb7 39.Rb5 Qc7 >>>40.a4 Ka7 [40...Qc1 41.Qh7-+ (41.Rxa5 Rd1 42.Qh8+ Bc8 43.Rb5+ Ka7 44.Ra5+ Kb7 >>>45.Rb5+ Ka6 46.Qxc8+ Qxc8-+) ] 41.Qh6 [41.Qf4 Qc3 42.g4 Bc6-+] 41...Qc3 >>>Threatening Bc6 42.Qf8 f5 Do you see the mate threat?[42...f5 43.Qc5+ Qxc5 >>>44.Rxc5 Rd5 45.Rxd5 Bxd5-+] Line > >Anatoli: > >45 seconds per move was the parameter. But remember, this was done with Fritz6a >in the Junior6a GUI. >Update as to your findings from ChessBase. >I will run analysis at 90 seconds per move just to test. Thanks! > >C Morris I don't believe it has anything to do with the engine but instead it's some problem with the GUI. So if you are using the J6 interface i don't think it's comparable
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.