Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 03:52:16 02/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2000 at 06:46:01, Dann Corbit wrote: >Chances are very good that your list is better. However, with the number of >games played, the real resolution of the results makes lower entries of >approximately equal point score practically indistinguishable in real life. In >other words, the tie breaks are probably better than no tie breaks [since we >have a strange penchant for wanting to put things into order], but we shouldn't >suppose that we are defining the real ordering with accuracy. Of course. I'm not trying to pass off my list as the be-all and end-all of program strength measurement. But it does accurately measure the performance of each program for the ICC tournament. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.