Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:41:04 02/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2000 at 01:17:23, Chessfun wrote: >>because the thing is a major thing for me. >>the question about materialism and idealism. about >>producing senseless data or about trying to qualify something. >>the difference between automatic process, while you sleep >>(24 chessbase engines fight out a blitz tournament while you be nice >>to your wife) and finding out something that is not written in the >>chart the chessbase product generated the next day in rt-format. >>if computerchess would be about this, we could all auto232-conect the machines. >>send the programmers home and let frederic post the flip-chart. >>maybe this is utopia for chessfun, for me it is 1984 = anti-utopia. >If inplace of speaking endless babble you had taken the time to read >what I had originally written you would have seen that I had said that >Hiarcs was good at blitz for Michael to play that with his Chess Tiger. >To which Christophe replied he thought this was a good idea. >Humans play blitz, humans are rated at blitz, why not computers?. i have no problem with measuring how good computers are in blitz. >Why do we play 40 moves in 120 mins because those are the time >controls set by humans. i do it because it is more convinient for me to watch. i can relax while watching. i could not follow a blitz-game and watch the main-lines in this speed. >But what is wrong with measuring in a different way. nothing. >Who are you to preach to others what is right or wrong. i do not preach you what is right or wrong. i told my opinion about what I think what is senseless. the automisation of a process that was build to learn, cannot replaced by a machine presenting you with a Number as a result in the end. this was my point. ><snip> >I am not hurt?, ?! yes or no - but a question ? > I am not insulted?, ?! yes or no ... >I just choose not to engage >with you in these endless lines of text which just are a waste >of others time reading them. (except maybe once per thread) nobody needs to click on it. anybody can filter what anybody wants to read. >I am not even sure why you would assume that your words could >hurt me, I find your persona to be pretty funny, which is where >the "bone blitz" came from. :-)) >God, I hope this is a different thread, otherwise I broke my >own rules. that is what captain kirk always does. its called beeing human ! only vulcans do not break their rules. most often. with exceotions. machines : they do not break their rules. therefore machines are boring. most often :-) >Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.