Author: Côme
Date: 03:33:49 02/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 08, 2000 at 17:54:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 08, 2000 at 17:38:24, Colin Frayn wrote: > >>On February 08, 2000 at 16:33:52, Michael de la Maza wrote: >> >>>Earlier today I recorded a 20-25 minute interview with Professor Robert Hyatt. >>>You can listen to the interview by: >><snip> >> >>Just listened to it - very interesting. >> >>Does anyone seriously believe what he said about computers not playing better >>with increased ply, or at least asymptotically slowing down? I have 600 games >>against Crafty which prove the opposite. > >I didn't say that. I said "there is plenty of evidence that says that an >additional ply is _always_ good." Either you misunderstood, or I did a >horrible job of answering that question. I will try to listen to it tonite >after class. But hopefully _everyone_ knows what I think about one more >ply. IE Crafty goes deep... > > > > >> >>I never thought about that connected passed pawns thing either. Damn that's >>obvious. > >Takes a GM to point out the obvious sometimes. I knew about it as I play that >way. But I never thought about it from a computer evaluation point of view >until Roman pointed out that I had lost three games out of 10 the same way >vs a GM on ICC. A critical oversight. > > > >> >>Thanks for the advice, Prof. Hyatt. That world title's mine next time :) >>*grin* >> >>Cheers, >>Colin > >Exactly how are you going to arrange for that "good luck" factor you need so >badly? :) Hello Bob, Congratulation for the fist place of ICC tournament. But why do you speak so fast, what you say seem very interesting but I have understood nothing:-((( Best Regards Alexandre Côme
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.