Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:30:39 02/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2000 at 10:23:41, Harald Faber wrote: >Feel free, I won't spend my time with such events, my time is much more >valuable. :-) oh it's an interesting puzzle to solve, isn't it ? >>harald played. and than we see if the result is that "strange" :-)) >>or harald could do the same himself. but i guess he is not >>motivated anymore :-) >Exactly. :-) thought so. >But I would like you to verify the short loss in round 12. Does Tal play the >same moves in manual play? Set 3h/game and let the clock run for Shredder as >long as you can see from the log/comments. it was 3 h per game but WITH pb or was it without PB ? no - this time you used 2 machines so it was WITH pb, or ? will do so. >What astonishes me is that Tal uses the Windows-auto232 while Ed only found >problems with the DOS-auto232. i have not sees "strange" results before with the win-version. i know stefan would never fake anything. so i am surprised myself. i thought we are over this puzzle by changing to windows. now you see me big worried. will play manually harald. thanks for the data. but i would like to continuethe game with shredder4 on the same hardware than cstal when MY cstal changes moves and i cannot anymore follow your pgn-path. since i do believe it's easier for ME to measure which program is buggy when i see both on same hardware.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.