Author: Harald Faber
Date: 07:36:59 02/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2000 at 10:30:39, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 09, 2000 at 10:23:41, Harald Faber wrote: >>Feel free, I won't spend my time with such events, my time is much more >>valuable. :-) > >oh it's an interesting puzzle to solve, isn't it ? Of course, but I won't solve it if I had to play more than 1 game manually... :-) >>But I would like you to verify the short loss in round 12. Does Tal play the >>same moves in manual play? Set 3h/game and let the clock run for Shredder as >>long as you can see from the log/comments. > >it was 3 h per game but WITH pb or was it without PB ? >no - this time you used 2 machines so it was WITH pb, or ? Of course it was. I only play without pb when playing on one machine, and you can say it is playing withoout pb when I play e-mail chess because there is no profit in using pb. > >will do so. > >>What astonishes me is that Tal uses the Windows-auto232 while Ed only found >>problems with the DOS-auto232. > >i have not sees "strange" results before with the win-version. >i know stefan would never fake anything. >so i am surprised myself. i thought we are over this puzzle >by changing to windows. > >now you see me big worried. >will play manually harald. thanks for the data. >but i would like to continuethe game with shredder4 on the same hardware >than cstal when MY cstal changes moves and i cannot anymore follow >your pgn-path. Feel free. Although I'd expect your Tal should make the same moves as your machine seems to be as fast as mine. Are you using the Tal2.03 update plus the 2.03 new style or the original one? >since i do believe it's easier for ME to measure >which program is buggy when i see both on same hardware.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.