Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 10:16:59 02/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 09, 2000 at 13:02:30, blass uri wrote: >On February 09, 2000 at 12:54:24, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On February 09, 2000 at 12:50:57, blass uri wrote: >> >>>On February 09, 2000 at 12:25:08, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On February 09, 2000 at 12:00:36, blass uri wrote: >>>> >>>>>2rqr1k1/p3bp1p/6p1/n1pnP3/3pB1b1/PP3N2/2QN1PPP/B1R1R2K b - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>This position is from game 19 between Fritz6a and rebel Century. >>>>>Rebel Century played 22...Rb8 after 81 seconds and lost the game. >>>>> >>>>>My original Rebel Century >>>> >>>>That's it. Did Ed send you the patched version that played in my tournament? >>>>It's supposed to be identical to yours, except for the removal of some code that >>>>improved the speed by 8%. It had to do with a discussion here between Ed and >>>>Bob. Later on, Ed found out that this new code harmed Century, removed it and >>>>sent me the patch. >>>> >>>>>(not 1.2) found after less than a minute on >>>>>pentiumIII450(slower than enrique's hardware) the move >>>>>22...Nf4 and does not change its mind. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>probably an autoplayer problem. >>>> >>>>Nope, I just checked. Century picks Rb8 at ply 7.02 after 15 seconds, +0.38 eval >>>>and keeps it until ply 9.01, when it switches to Nf4 after 238 seconds, +0.43. >>>>Ed can confirm. >>> >>>I played a game against the original Rebel century that I got when I bought it >>>and it found Nf4 in less than a minute. >>> >>>I used the infinite time control and told it to move when it used enough time. >>>It could produce all the moves before Nf4 but swithced to Nf4 after less than a >>>minute. >>> >>>Maybe the difference is because I used the game and not the position without the >>>game. >> >>I used the game too, of course. >> >>>I do not know. >> >>If you check it with the patch Ed sent me, you will get the same results. >> >>Enrique > >It seems that this patch is not productive for Rebel Century Well... what can I say. If Ed sent it for the tournament it must be because it is at least not worse than the original Century. > because the >commercial Rebel century without the patch can find Nf4 faster(only 58 seconds >on my pentiumII450) One move, come on.. It doesn't prove that a program is better than another. Enrique >Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.