Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:13:16 02/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2000 at 01:04:50, Lonnie Cook wrote: >On February 09, 2000 at 23:30:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On February 09, 2000 at 23:00:35, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>Integrated = on-die. So it should be running at the same speed as the core. But >>>the design of the L2 cache may have increased latencies, so it's possible that >>>it won't be as fast as some people think it "should" be. >>> >>>-Tom >> >>hm. >>whatever - could be a killer-cpu for cstal. > >I have run CSTal a little Thorsten and I was getting 50-60K on mine on 1000 ? that would be 3.3 - 4 times faster than on my k6-3/400 ! nice nice nice.
This page took 0.04 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.