Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 07:52:38 02/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2000 at 10:13:16, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On February 10, 2000 at 01:04:50, Lonnie Cook wrote: > >>On February 09, 2000 at 23:30:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On February 09, 2000 at 23:00:35, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >>> >>>>Integrated = on-die. So it should be running at the same speed as the core. But >>>>the design of the L2 cache may have increased latencies, so it's possible that >>>>it won't be as fast as some people think it "should" be. >>>> >>>>-Tom >>> >>>hm. >>>whatever - could be a killer-cpu for cstal. >> >>I have run CSTal a little Thorsten and I was getting 50-60K on mine > >on 1000 ? > >that would be 3.3 - 4 times faster than on my k6-3/400 ! >nice nice nice. That's because the KryoTech 1000 Mhz L2-cache runs at 400 Mhz. I hope my new toy will arrive tomorrow :-) Ed
This page took 0.04 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.