Author: Peter Kappler
Date: 11:35:24 02/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2000 at 10:52:38, Ed Schröder wrote: >On February 10, 2000 at 10:13:16, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On February 10, 2000 at 01:04:50, Lonnie Cook wrote: >> >>>On February 09, 2000 at 23:30:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>> >>>>On February 09, 2000 at 23:00:35, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >>>> >>>>>Integrated = on-die. So it should be running at the same speed as the core. But >>>>>the design of the L2 cache may have increased latencies, so it's possible that >>>>>it won't be as fast as some people think it "should" be. >>>>> >>>>>-Tom >>>> >>>>hm. >>>>whatever - could be a killer-cpu for cstal. >>> >>>I have run CSTal a little Thorsten and I was getting 50-60K on mine >> >>on 1000 ? >> >>that would be 3.3 - 4 times faster than on my k6-3/400 ! >>nice nice nice. > >That's because the KryoTech 1000 Mhz L2-cache runs at 400 Mhz. I hope >my new toy will arrive tomorrow :-) > >Ed Hi Ed, When will we get a chance to see this machine in action in a GM Challenge game? --Peter
This page took 0.04 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.