Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 12:56:26 02/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2000 at 14:35:24, Peter Kappler wrote: >On February 10, 2000 at 10:52:38, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On February 10, 2000 at 10:13:16, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On February 10, 2000 at 01:04:50, Lonnie Cook wrote: >>> >>>>On February 09, 2000 at 23:30:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 09, 2000 at 23:00:35, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Integrated = on-die. So it should be running at the same speed as the core. But >>>>>>the design of the L2 cache may have increased latencies, so it's possible that >>>>>>it won't be as fast as some people think it "should" be. >>>>>> >>>>>>-Tom >>>>> >>>>>hm. >>>>>whatever - could be a killer-cpu for cstal. >>>> >>>>I have run CSTal a little Thorsten and I was getting 50-60K on mine >>> >>>on 1000 ? >>> >>>that would be 3.3 - 4 times faster than on my k6-3/400 ! >>>nice nice nice. >> >>That's because the KryoTech 1000 Mhz L2-cache runs at 400 Mhz. I hope >>my new toy will arrive tomorrow :-) >> >>Ed > > >Hi Ed, > >When will we get a chance to see this machine in action in a GM Challenge game? > >--Peter Hopefully end of this month but there can be a little delay. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.