Author: stuart taylor
Date: 19:35:08 02/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2000 at 16:55:44, Pete Galati wrote: >On February 10, 2000 at 16:35:20, C Morris wrote: > >>Bronstein seemed to be saying that Chess was for everyone. He was trying to get >>the point over by pointing to the attitude of grandmasters like Botvinnik, who, >>to paraphrase Bronstein in "The Sorcerer's Apprentice", thought only they knew >>how to move a knight, push a pawn, etc. I like Bobby Fisher's attitude when he >>said, he only "believes in good moves." I just like good moves whether or not >>they come from Junior or Kasparov or a class player. I have no problems with the >>idea shared by more than a few grandmasters, that someday a computer will be >>world champion. This does not threaten anything. Just my opinion. > >If there are Grandmasters that think a program will become world champion then >they don't have a very clear idea what they're talking about. The game of Chess >itself is between 2 people. > >Once a program enters the picture, that's a different story. Having a human >Chess world champion and having a computer Chess world champion are 2 different >things completely. > >Pete Dosen't world champion mean best player? Atleast isn't that what such a grandmaster(or any person) would be meaning to infer? S.Taylor.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.