Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 07:04:53 02/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 10, 2000 at 22:18:09, Lonnie Cook wrote: >On February 10, 2000 at 10:52:38, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On February 10, 2000 at 10:13:16, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>On February 10, 2000 at 01:04:50, Lonnie Cook wrote: >>> >>>>On February 09, 2000 at 23:30:14, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 09, 2000 at 23:00:35, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Integrated = on-die. So it should be running at the same speed as the core. But >>>>>>the design of the L2 cache may have increased latencies, so it's possible that >>>>>>it won't be as fast as some people think it "should" be. >>>>>> >>>>>>-Tom >>>>> >>>>>hm. >>>>>whatever - could be a killer-cpu for cstal. >>>> >>>>I have run CSTal a little Thorsten and I was getting 50-60K on mine >>> >>>on 1000 ? > >Yeap! > >>> >>>that would be 3.3 - 4 times faster than on my k6-3/400 ! >>>nice nice nice. >> >>That's because the KryoTech 1000 Mhz L2-cache runs at 400 Mhz. I hope >>my new toy will arrive tomorrow :-) > >Ed, >R u getting one too? I hope u get the one with the "Enhance" power supply(this >one has an on/off button for power supply) and MS 6167 mbd cause that one is >stable verse the Aztech power supply and GA7IX mbd, had lot of problems with >that combo BUT they shipped me new one and I shipped old one back, they paid for >everything too! Hi Lonny, Thanks for hint, I will pay attention. Have you made some stats? Any idea how much faster the Super-G is? Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.