Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Academics Are Missing an Obvious Idea

Author: Vincent Vega

Date: 22:01:38 02/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 11, 2000 at 22:58:30, Tom Kerrigan wrote:

>Let's say you just paid $1,000,000 for a 10GHz Athlon. You put an ATI Rage Pro
>video card in it. You run Quake 3 and get < 10 frames per second.
>
>Then you go to a garage sale and get a 200MHz Pentium. You put a TNT2 video card
>in it. You run Quake 3 and get 20 frames per second.
>
>What you're proposing is pretty much like playing Q3 on the Athlon...
>
>-Tom

No.  This is only the case if only chess algorithms were serial algorithms.  But
that's not true.  How much will be the penalty - that's an open question.  I
think it can be made reasonable.

What I'm proposing is instead of spending $1,000,000 for a multi-processor
machine to spend $10,000 on hardware (or use the school's hardware for free
:-)but develop good algorithms and use the power of the Net.  Look at these
stats from SETI@home:

Last 24 Hours
Total CPU time: 1040.82 years

You'd need just a fraction of that to get a pretty powerful system.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.