Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Terrible User Interfaces in Chess Programs

Author: James Swafford

Date: 06:03:39 02/12/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 11, 2000 at 20:24:30, Vincent Vega wrote:


Most chess programmers would prefer to concentrate on the
strength of their engines, hence the flood of new winboard/
xboard engines.

There are some, albeit few, that are working on their own
interface. :-)

I have no idea why anybody would create a new DOS program.

--
James


>Can somebody please explain to me why are chess programmers so seemingly unable
>to create a decent user interface?  Half of the programs run only under Firtz
>interface or under X/Winboard.  While it seems like it is a logical choice not
>to reinvent the wheel, those interfaces are very far from being good.  They are
>so limited and so unintuitive.  The other half is much worse - how can anyone
>justify having a DOS program in the 21st century?
>
>And before somebody says that it's hard, why don't you do it yourself, blah,
>blah - I just finished a 200,000 LOC commercial program with UI complexity much
>greater than any chess program ever had, so I know it can be done and no I won't
>do it unless there is good money involved.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.