Author: Vincent Vega
Date: 20:50:18 02/12/00
I don’t see any other use for 90% of amateur programs than allowing their authors to learn programming. While learning to program is a good motivation, it appears that many experienced programmers are also creating Yet Another Chess Program. The reason it’s such a waste of time is that most of them just use the obvious pattern – single threaded, alpha-beta, fast searcher. Why? Because it’s easy. But there are so many real challenges out there: big knowledge programs, programs that play human-like, use of genetic algorithms, use of neural nets, parallel programs, distributed programs, programs using pattern recognition, algorithms for quantum computers, etc. that are waiting for advances. Instead what we get is another Crafty-wannabe. Sigh.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.