Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 13:23:35 02/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2000 at 11:33:44, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >It's a 1924 study of Troitzky that is great in my opinion, because I like it, >for the sheer aesthetic pleasure. This is cute for a different reason than you might imagine. It also does a _remarkable_ job of ordering the programs by tactical speed. Which isn't always the most important thing of course. But take a glance at your list and you'll see what I mean. It might also be an "inverse knowledge" ordering as well... as more complex evals tend to slow down tactical findings..... > >[D]8/2pp2pp/8/2PP1P2/1p5k/8/PP4p1/6K1 w - - 0 1 > >Main line: > >1. f6 gxf6 2. Kxg2 Kg4 3. a4 bxa3 4. bxa3 Kf5 5. a4 Ke5 6. d6 cxd6 7. c6 dxc6 >8. a5 1-0 > >On a PIII-500: > >Tiger, 25'' >Nimzo, 57'' >F6a, 193'' >J6, 393'' >Century 1.2, 401'' >Hiarcs 8pa, 538'' >H732 and Shredder 4, > 15 minutes > >Enrique
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.