Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5)

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 00:23:08 02/14/00

I just uploaded a new version of TSCP. It should be much faster and much more
stable than older versions. And it has the ever-popular ability to search for a
fixed amount of time. (!) Here's the version log:

Version 1.5, 2/13/00
* Changed all of the "time control" code. Now TSCP can search for a fixed
  amount of time.
* Stopped searching all responses to check in the quiescence search--it was
  causing the search tree to blow up.
* Fixed passed pawn scoring asymmetry.
* Added a test to make sure the search doesn't go too deep and overflow
  everything.

-Tom

• PIII 733MHz bench 120Knps for NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Brian Richardson 19:37:21 02/14/00
• Re: Compiling on the Mac Michael Neish 19:03:01 02/14/00
  • Re: Compiling on the Mac Ian Osgood 09:50:55 02/15/00
    • Re: Compiling on the Mac Michael Neish 06:10:28 02/16/00
  • Re: Compiling on the Mac Will Singleton 20:50:59 02/14/00
• 86,770 NPS on PIII 500 MHz. Dann Corbit 18:21:59 02/14/00
  • Re: 86,770 NPS on PIII 500 MHz. Pete Galati 19:02:54 02/14/00
    • Re: 86,770 NPS on PIII 500 MHz. Dann Corbit 20:32:32 02/14/00
      • Re: 86,770 NPS on PIII 500 MHz. Pete Galati 21:24:43 02/14/00
• Re: Some bench results TSCP (1.5) Pete Galati 17:12:57 02/14/00
  • Re: Some bench results TSCP (1.5) Dann Corbit 17:19:03 02/14/00
• Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Peter Skinner 13:54:23 02/14/00
  • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Tom Kerrigan 15:05:06 02/14/00
• Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Dann Corbit 13:26:40 02/14/00
  • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Tom Kerrigan 13:47:22 02/14/00
    • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Endgame play Andrew 21:50:01 02/14/00
      • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Endgame play Tom Kerrigan 09:34:45 02/16/00
    • Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 14:00:52 02/14/00
      • Re: Why idempotent? Sanjiv Karnataki 17:47:20 02/14/00
        • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 18:06:26 02/14/00
          • Re: Why idempotent? Sanjiv Karnataki 18:49:15 02/14/00
            • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 19:36:25 02/14/00
              • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 19:36:59 02/14/00
      • Re: Why idempotent? William Bryant 15:22:34 02/14/00
        • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 15:58:51 02/14/00
        • Re: Why idempotent? Daniel Clausen 15:43:16 02/14/00
          • Re: Why idempotent? Heiner Marxen 09:50:46 02/15/00
            • Re: Why idempotent? Daniel Clausen 13:02:05 02/15/00
              • Re: Off topic: reserved identifiers in C Heiner Marxen 13:23:41 02/15/00
      • Re: Why idempotent? Pete Galati 14:37:44 02/14/00
        • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 14:45:37 02/14/00
          • Re: Why idempotent? Pete Galati 15:28:44 02/14/00
          • Re: Why idempotent? Tom Kerrigan 15:03:44 02/14/00
            • Re: Why idempotent? Dann Corbit 16:01:11 02/14/00
    • Idempotent Dann Corbit 13:57:40 02/14/00
  • TSCP 1.5 benchmarks on PII 300 MHz (NT 4.0) with MS VC++ and GCC Dann Corbit 13:41:59 02/14/00
• Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Daniel Clausen 12:23:21 02/14/00
  • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Tom Kerrigan 13:05:54 02/14/00
    • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Daniel Clausen 13:51:55 02/14/00
    • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Dann Corbit 13:48:54 02/14/00
  • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Pete Galati 13:03:26 02/14/00
    • Re: NEW VERSION OF TSCP (1.5) Daniel Clausen 14:00:04 02/14/00
• and here's where you can get it... heh... Tom Kerrigan 00:23:50 02/14/00
  • Re: and here's where you can get it... heh... Michael Neish 00:50:18 02/14/00
    • Re: and here's where you can get it... heh... Tom Kerrigan 01:42:02 02/14/00

This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.