Author: pete
Date: 13:45:57 02/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 13, 2000 at 10:27:58, Marc van Hal wrote: >I still find it strange they did,nt read my post corectly before after Nh4,Bg4 >f3,Bh5 g4,Nd5 Ng2,Bg6 Qb3,a5 e4,Nb6 Be3,Nxc4 Qxc4,Nd7 ther are only 2 good moves >and that's Rfd1 and Bf2 the rook fd1 setup contineus with the plan Ra1c1 >followed by Bf2 to place the knight from g2 to e3 this is the only corect path >all other setups are wrong and by that all computer programs will call Nh4 the >wrong line wich is not the fact. >programs don't find this line because of a threat on e4 but is overlooking the >fact that the bischop is pinned when black first takes the knight on c3 because >of Rxc3. >also the programs still will say that black has a slight edge also this is not >the fact the positional advantage of White will give White the edge in the end. >Also the Bf2 contineus with the same setup as with the Rook fd1 setup. >This is why i stopped posting in the first place nobody read the fully anelyzed >games i posted and only knew how to bug a person who only wanted to help. Hi Marc, I think you often post very interesting stuff. The problem though it is very hard to get your message sometimes . For example : I am quite experienced with chess books and opening preparation but the first thing I thought was : what is he talking about ? After some thinking I thought you were probably talking about slav main line but you really make it a little hard for others to follow ; so I think it is not lack of interest on the board but maybe people simply can't understand- I think if you started from the beginning of the game preferrably in PGN notation with 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 etc . you make it a lot easier Then after Nxc4 Qxc4 Nbd7 when the critical position you want to discuss is reached it would be nice to have an FEN or even better a diagram . Then you might add a question like : here is the line I want to discuss ; what does your program give ? is there any flaw in my analysis ; as you seem to be a very experienced chessplayer I think many people will be happy to discuss your ideas and compair it with the programs' ideas and their own reflections. Also it seems you refer to another post here ; what might it have been ? You have to admit this is hard to guess for someone who doesn't read _every_ message . I hope I haven't said anything offensive ( at least this _really_ wasn't my intention ) but I already had the impression when you stopped posting your interesting opening analysis that your idea that nobody was interested was simply a misunderstanding .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.