Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 19:21:47 02/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 14, 2000 at 20:16:16, Peter Kasinski wrote: >Tom, > >This is true for bus speeds higher than 75MHz. Reports of Celerons not working >at 75MHz bus speed mostly turn out to be non-CPU related. A video card or IDE >controller failing, etc. > >But that's not the point. No one over-clocks if they can't boot the PC after >that. And if they can, running Winstone (or such like) for 24 hours to see if >the system is stable answers that question quite well. Again, I am NOT talking >about pushing the envelope. Only about repeating what thousands have done. > >BTW, I read here that in Paderborn Shredder ran on a dual Celeron 563 MHz. >Sounds like Stefan is one of these people, doesn't it? > >cheers, >PK I'm just saying that you can't always overclock Celerons. Let's say you're Intel. You make a batch of Celerons that will not run above 400MHz. Do you throw them all out, or do you sell them as 400MHz parts? You obviously sell them. So all I'm saying is that there are definitely some Celerons that can not be overclocked. IMO, overclocking your FSB to 75MHz is an absolutely stupid idea. That means you're also overclocking your memory and your PCI cards, among other things. The chance that everything will be stable is almost nil. And it's obviously no good for your computer. A much smarter thing to do is to get a BX board, which is designed to drive a processor at 100MHz while maintaining appropriate memory/PCI speeds. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.