Author: blass uri
Date: 03:16:27 02/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2000 at 05:51:31, stuart taylor wrote: > I wonder if it will eventually be discovered that chess is not absolute, >and that a human will therefore always be able to beat a machine by playing >exactly against the weaker points of that particular machines style-everything >else being to perfection? > Maybe chess isn't an exacting art-absolutely? > Stuart Taylor If the machine has no weak points then it is impossible to play exactly against the weaker points of the machine and there is no reason to assume that it is impossible to do a machine with no weak points. Today there is no machine with no weaks points and there is no machine that can pass the turing test(every machine can do positional mistakes that I do not expect humans even with 1800 elo rating to do) but it is practically impossible for most of the humans to play exactly against the weaker points of the machine because you cannot go practically to the positions that the machine does not understand. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.