Author: Côme
Date: 04:16:12 02/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2000 at 06:16:27, blass uri wrote: >On February 15, 2000 at 05:51:31, stuart taylor wrote: > >> I wonder if it will eventually be discovered that chess is not absolute, >>and that a human will therefore always be able to beat a machine by playing >>exactly against the weaker points of that particular machines style-everything >>else being to perfection? >> Maybe chess isn't an exacting art-absolutely? >> Stuart Taylor > >If the machine has no weak points then it is impossible to play exactly against >the weaker points of the machine and there is no reason to assume that it is >impossible to do a machine with no weak points. > >Today there is no machine with no weaks points and there is no machine that can >pass the turing test(every machine can do positional mistakes that I do not >expect humans even with 1800 elo rating to do) but it is practically impossible >for most of the humans to play exactly against the weaker points of the machine >because you cannot go practically to the positions that the machine does not >understand. > >Uri Hello Uri, I don't agree with you Uri ! It's not so hard to play against weaks points of machine ! Best Regards Alexandre Côme
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.