Author: Côme
Date: 13:22:53 02/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 15, 2000 at 21:23:00, Howard Exner wrote: >On February 15, 2000 at 16:13:14, Côme wrote: > >>On February 15, 2000 at 14:21:27, Howard Exner wrote: >> >>>On February 15, 2000 at 13:35:14, Laurence Chen wrote: >>> >>>>On February 15, 2000 at 13:08:19, Côme wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Hello, >>>>>In this position: >>>>>[D]4q1kr/p6p/1prQPppB/4n3/4P3/2P5/PP2B2P/R5K1 w - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>After 10 min on my K6 II 350 Junior 6 don't find the winning move Qxe5!! . >>>>>I guess that no program is able to find this move but Can you test others >>>>>programs ? >>>>>Best Regards >>>>>Alexandre Côme >>>>Can you put all the remaining moves? I find it annoying when people put only >>>>one move and states that is a winning one without further giving the rest of the >>>>moves. Humans when doing a post mortem, they don't just say that this move would >>>>save or win the game without further giving a variation or list of move to prove >>>>that yes that move is the best one. I cannot see how after 1. Qxe5 fxe5 would >>>>White win? >>>>Laurence >>> >>>Although Alexandre's posts are always for me very interesting he seldom or >>>never posts the move sequences until asked. It would also be nice if the source >>>was included as to who played the game. >>> >>>The above is an example of black being in a bind and eventually running out of >>>moves. Two possible quick lines are: >>> >>>A. 1. Qxe5 fxe5 2. Rf1 Qe7 3. Bd1 Rc7 4. Bb3 Rc8 5. Rf7 Re8 6. Bd5 b5 7. b4 >>>a6 8. Kg2 a5 9. bxa5 b4 >>> >>>B. 1. Qxe5 fxe5 2. Rf1 Rc7 3. Bd1 Re7 4. Bb3 a5 5. a4 Qc8 6. Bd5 Qb8 7. b4 >>>axb4 8. cxb4 Qd8 9. a5 bxa5 10. bxa5 Qb8 11. a6 g5 12. Kg2 >>> >>>The moves above will show the general theme but there is no doubt an accurate >>>sequence of best moves that Alexandre will eventually post. >>> >>>The most curious thing about this particular post is the heading >>>" ... that Junior 6 don't find!!" Why single out Junior6 with double exclamation >>>marks? Anyone familiar with how computers play will know that they >>>won't spot these long range themes. >> >> >>Hello Howard, >> >>Ok, you are right and from now I will post who as played the game, for this >>diagram it's Gusev against Auerbakh. >>I never post the move sequences because IMHO it's more interesting if the reader >>search by himself ! no ? > >I like searching on my own. Your posted positions are usually more deep than the >average posting and so I trust that your positions are correct even if the >winning first move is not that obvious. If you were to post one with the >solution and one without the solution I would probably read the one without >first. Plus I kinow that you provide the solution when asked. So keep these >tough problems coming our way. > >>I have wrote "... that Junior 6 don't find" because I think that more people >>will open the post if he read that the number one of the SSDF don't find the >>winning move. > >OK I understand. But most of us here who like these kinds of posts know that >your reputation for interesting positions is proven. So for me I would read them >even without the more interesting header. > >>But of course I know that machine are not able to solve Qxe5!! . >>Best Regards >>Alexandre Côme > >Do you save all of these tough positions ? If so, maybe you could post them all >here in one posting. Those that missed your previos posts could have the >complete collection then. Hello Howard, Thank you ! Sorry but I have not save positions :-( Best Regards Alexandre Côme
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.