Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 08:08:26 02/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2000 at 10:43:08, Martin wrote: >I don't believe this conspiracy theory. Read >http://www.clubkasparov.com/serve/templates/dispchessdoc.asp?p_docID=2499&p_docLang=EN >Mig Greengard and his team are responsible for the decision. They had two >choices: > >1) To postpone the second game which would have been to the advantage of the >machine. > >2) To declare the match lost by DJ by forfeit which is to the advantage of >Adams. > >I think too, that in this situation no 2 was the only possibility. Mig writes: >"The forfeit was by no means the fault of Deep Junior, its operators, or the >KasparovChess.com software, and to our knowledge all of the above performed >quite well. [...]" >"They, particularly the Junior team, have good reason to be outraged at their >misfortune at the hands of fate and our disregard for proper protocol. They have >the sincere apologies of the entire KasparovChess.com team, and as >editor-in-chief they have my personal apology for allowing such a marvelous >opportunity to turn into a disaster through my own negligence." > >There's nothing to add. I agree. Everyone knew that Adams was playing Seirawan at Bermuda, so it would have been unreasonable to ask Adams to wait forever as explained by MiG. Tough luck on DJ, but I'll get the chance another time. The conspiracy claim is a rather sad example of bad reasoning. Count to ten first. Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.