Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 12:10:57 02/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 17, 2000 at 09:40:59, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On February 17, 2000 at 02:29:36, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On February 16, 2000 at 21:06:00, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On February 16, 2000 at 16:28:06, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>> >>>>On February 16, 2000 at 13:15:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>If you mean "X86-compatible only" then the fastest Intel processor is the best, >>>>>and more than one cpu is even better. In the intel world, the best (so far) is >>>>>the XEON processor, as it can be had in an 8-cpu box that is _really_ fast. (and >>>>>really pricey too of course). >>>> >>>>Even Xeon processors are pretty pricey. About what percentage difference is >>>>there between a normal P-III and an Athlon, assuming the same clock rate? >>>> >>>>Dave >>> >>> >>>I only mentioned XEON because of SMP. We have a new PIII/800 that looks >>>pretty good as a single-cpu machine. But I'd take a quad (or 8-way) xeon >>>550 box any day, of course. :) >> >>I don't follow... Xeon isn't required for SMP. I just thought they were great >>because they have a whole whack of L2 cache on them!? >> >>Dave > > >XEON is the only X86 that can go to 4-way and 8-way SMP. The normal pentiums >(P5, PII, PIII) can only go to 2-way. Of course, a 2-way PIII/800 is likely >faster than a XEON/550 4-way... but new xeons are on the way. Thanks. I didn't realize that the non-Xeons maxed out at 2-way SMP. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.