Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 12:16:09 02/17/00

Go up one level in this thread

On February 17, 2000 at 09:31:10, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On February 17, 2000 at 09:10:19, Jouni Uski wrote:
>
>>To continue this "tournament" is pure waste of time as Kasparov is already
>>declared as winner. Why can't Adams / DJ re-played???
>>
>>Jouni
>
>
>I believe someone is 'afraid'.  I am not convinced it is "Adams" however.
>I'll leave the rest to your imagination.

Come on.  That's as ridiculous as some of the stuff people post about Deep Blue.

Dave

• Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision Robert Hyatt 05:26:07 02/18/00
  • Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision blass uri 09:14:41 02/18/00
    • Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision Robert Hyatt 14:03:35 02/18/00
• Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision Terry Presgrove 12:35:33 02/17/00
  • Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision Dave Gomboc 14:31:13 02/17/00
    • Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision odell hall 17:41:44 02/17/00
    • Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision Terry Presgrove 15:52:59 02/17/00
      • Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision Dave Gomboc 00:57:18 02/18/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.