Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: No. The decision is bitter but understandable.

Author: Eric Fitch

Date: 12:55:37 02/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 2000 at 10:43:08, Martin wrote:

>On February 17, 2000 at 05:50:54, Ritter Rost wrote:
>
>>Yesterday night, a Vice President of kasparovchess.com ordered the result of the
>>match Adams - Deep Junior to be 2 : 0 because of "internet lag".
>>
>>Kasparov watched Adams - Deep Junior and suddenly understood the very danger of
>>losing to this machine in the next round. President Kasparov doesn't like to
>>lose. So he ordered his Vice President to order the match won for Adams.
>
>I don't believe this conspiracy theory. Read
>http://www.clubkasparov.com/serve/templates/dispchessdoc.asp?p_docID=2499&p_docLang=EN
>Mig Greengard and his team are responsible for the decision. They had two
>choices:
>
>1) To postpone the second game which would have been to the advantage of the
>machine.
>

What advantage are you referring to here? By postponing, do you mean playing
another day? If so, I can't see how that would result in an unfair advantage to
DJ. Adams other commitments to other matches should play NO part in any official
decision by KC. That's a scheduling conflict he should have thought of before
agreeing to participate.


>2) To declare the match lost by DJ by forfeit which is to the advantage of
>Adams.
>
>I think too, that in this situation no 2 was the only possibility. Mig writes:
>"The forfeit was by no means the fault of Deep Junior, its operators, or the
>KasparovChess.com software, and to our knowledge all of the above performed
>quite well. [...]"
>"They, particularly the Junior team, have good reason to be outraged at their
>misfortune at the hands of fate and our disregard for proper protocol. They have
>the sincere apologies of the entire KasparovChess.com team, and as
>editor-in-chief they have my personal apology for allowing such a marvelous
>opportunity to turn into a disaster through my own negligence."
>
>There's nothing to add.
>
>>
>>We are totally bored to see Kasparov play Adams. We are bored to see President
>>Kasparov win the Kasparov Grand Prix in kasparovchess.com. We wanted to see the
>>fantastic match Deep Junior - Kasparov.
>
>Yes, I'd like to see it too. We all - even Mig I'm sure - would like to see that
>match.
>Now we have to wait for the next opportunity. The show must and will go on.
>
>Martin
>
>>
>>So lets just not watch those boring human games and boycot the rest of this
>>stupid farce of a tournament where arbiters are overruled by "business
>>decisions".
>>
>>Ritter



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.