Author: Alvaro Polo
Date: 01:07:51 02/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2000 at 04:03:53, Mig wrote: >On February 18, 2000 at 03:48:31, Dave Gomboc wrote: >> >>I don't believe that it is necessary (or even a good thing) to limit computer >>players to specific man-machine events. What I do think is necessary for >>successful mixed events to take place is recognition that a non-human tournament >>participant is entitled to all of the rights, privileges, and respect that human >>participants receive. That might sound like a very weird statement to someone >>that doesn't attempt to make machines perform tasks traditionally done by >>humans, but it is essential. > >That's great in theory, but there will always be exceptions, like the one we ran >into. We can give all those rights to a computer player, but when problems arise >that only affect the human player, how can we compensate? If DJ had been an >Israeli GM we'd have known that both players were equally exhausted and nervous >so no advantage was being gained by either side due to the delay. But with a >computer this wasn't true and we all know that. The amount of nervous energy top >GMs expend is enormous, and to charge up again after five hours is not easily >done. At the end of the day they are different. Maybe only one case in 100 would >make these differences relevant, but we had one yesterday. > >Saludos, Mig > Your messages are a possible explanation, but I believe there are also other possible explanations for what happened. Something that may be of interest to you is that yesterday, at ICC, there were less people watching Kasparov play that the day before watching DJ play. Alvaro >mig@kasparovchess.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.