Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 05:26:07 02/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 17, 2000 at 15:16:09, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>On February 17, 2000 at 09:31:10, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On February 17, 2000 at 09:10:19, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>To continue this "tournament" is pure waste of time as Kasparov is already
>>>declared as winner. Why can't Adams / DJ re-played???
>>>
>>>Jouni
>>
>>
>>I believe someone is 'afraid'.  I am not convinced it is "Adams" however.
>>I'll leave the rest to your imagination.
>
>Come on.  That's as ridiculous as some of the stuff people post about Deep Blue.
>
>Dave


I believe that _any_ GM would be afraid of a computer in game/X events.  If
they aren't, they are not living in reality.  I don't believe that was why
the match was given to Adams.  But I do believe there is "fear".

That is based on experience and knowledge.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.