Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: IMO Kasparov uninvolved in decision

Author: blass uri

Date: 09:14:41 02/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On February 18, 2000 at 08:26:07, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On February 17, 2000 at 15:16:09, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>
>>On February 17, 2000 at 09:31:10, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>On February 17, 2000 at 09:10:19, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>
>>>>To continue this "tournament" is pure waste of time as Kasparov is already
>>>>declared as winner. Why can't Adams / DJ re-played???
>>>>
>>>>Jouni
>>>
>>>
>>>I believe someone is 'afraid'.  I am not convinced it is "Adams" however.
>>>I'll leave the rest to your imagination.
>>
>>Come on.  That's as ridiculous as some of the stuff people post about Deep Blue.
>>
>>Dave
>
>
>I believe that _any_ GM would be afraid of a computer in game/X events.

I think that it is dependent on X
if X=240 minutes then I do not think they will be afraid more than they are
afraid from 2 hours/40 moves games

Uri

 If
>they aren't, they are not living in reality.  I don't believe that was why
>the match was given to Adams.  But I do believe there is "fear".
>
>That is based on experience and knowledge.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.