Author: Will Singleton
Date: 13:30:09 02/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On February 18, 2000 at 14:46:40, Ernst Walet wrote: >This is what Fritz6a thinks about it. > >[D]5rrk/p1p1bppq/1p6/3PPP2/2P5/P3B2P/4Q2K/R4R2 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 6: > >1.Bxb6 > = (0.00) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.Bxb6 axb6 > µ (-0.97) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.Qg4 > ± (0.88) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.Qg4 > +- (1.59) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1.Qg4 Re8 > +- (1.47) Depth: 2/5 00:00:00 >1.Qg4 Re8 2.Kg2 > +- (1.53) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 >1.Qg4 Re8 2.Kg2 Bf6 > +- (1.47) Depth: 4/11 00:00:00 >1.Qg4 Re8 2.e6 Rgf8 3.Rfe1 fxe6 4.fxe6 > +- (1.50) Depth: 5/13 00:00:00 4kN >1.Qg4 Re8 2.e6 Rgf8 3.Rfe1 fxe6 4.fxe6 > +- (1.50) Depth: 6/21 00:00:00 21kN >1.Qg4 Re8 2.e6 Rgf8 3.Rfe1 fxe6 4.fxe6 a6 > +- (1.44) Depth: 7/21 00:00:00 43kN >1.Qg4 Re8 2.e6 Rgf8 3.Rfe1 fxe6 4.fxe6 a6 5.Kg1 > +- (1.50) Depth: 8/21 00:00:00 154kN >1.Qg4 Re8 2.e6 Rgf8 3.Rfe1 fxe6 4.fxe6 a6 5.Kg1 Qd3 > +- (1.50) Depth: 9/23 00:00:01 358kN >1.Qg4 Rd8 2.e6 Rgf8 3.Bd4 c5 4.Be3 fxe6 5.fxe6 Qd3 > +- (1.53) Depth: 10/32 00:00:09 2742kN >1.Qg4 Re8 2.e6 Rgf8 3.Bd4 fxe6 4.fxe6 c6 5.Rxf8+ Bxf8 > +- (1.59) Depth: 11/33 00:00:30 9044kN >1.Qg4-- > ± (1.28) Depth: 12/21 00:00:32 9718kN >1.Qg4 > ± (1.28) Depth: 12/31 00:00:34 10298kN >1.Kg2 > ± (1.31) Depth: 12/32 00:00:55 16753kN >1.c5 > ± (1.34) Depth: 12/32 00:01:34 28924kN >1.c5 bxc5 2.Rac1 Re8 3.Bxc5 Bxc5 4.Rxc5 Re7 5.e6 Qh6 > +- (1.47) Depth: 12/33 00:02:18 42272kN >1.c5 bxc5 2.Rac1 Re8 3.Bxc5 Bxc5 4.Rxc5 Re7 5.Ra5 Rge8 > +- (1.53) Depth: 13/38 00:06:58 129017kN >1.c5 bxc5 2.Rac1 Rd8 3.Bxc5 Rge8 4.Bxe7 Rxe7 5.f6 gxf6 > +- (1.56) Depth: 14/38 00:17:13 325070kN >1.c5 bxc5 2.Rac1 Rd8 3.Qf3 Rde8 4.Rfe1 Bh4 5.Bf2 Bxf2 > +- (1.50) Depth: 15/38 00:24:11 464396kN >1.Qg4 > +- (1.53) Depth: 15/38 00:26:25 507485kN > > >[D]5rrk/p1p1bppq/1p2P3/3P1P2/2P5/P3B2P/4Q2K/R4R2 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 6: > >1...Qxh3+ > +- (5.66) Depth: 1/3 00:00:00 >1...Qxh3+ 2.Kxh3 > +- (9.31) Depth: 1/8 00:00:00 >1...fxe6 > +- (3.94) Depth: 1/8 00:00:00 >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 > +- (1.56) Depth: 1/12 00:00:00 >1...Qh4 > ± (1.37) Depth: 1/12 00:00:00 >1...Qh4 > ± (1.22) Depth: 1/12 00:00:00 >1...Qh4 2.Qg4 > ± (1.34) Depth: 2/12 00:00:00 >1...Qh4 2.Qg4 Qh7 > +- (1.59) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 1kN >1...Bd6+ > +- (1.50) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 1kN >1...Bd6+ 2.Kg2 fxe6 3.fxe6 Qe4+ 4.Kg1 Rxf1+ > ± (1.37) Depth: 3/25 00:00:00 3kN >1...fxe6 > ± (1.34) Depth: 3/25 00:00:00 4kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Bd6+ 3.Kg2 Qe4+ 4.Kg1 Rxf1+ 5.Rxf1 Bxa3 > ± (1.34) Depth: 4/17 00:00:00 7kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Rxf1 3.Rxf1 Bxa3 4.Rf7 Bd6+ 5.Kg2 Qe4+ 6.Kg1 > ± (1.34) Depth: 5/18 00:00:00 24kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Rxf1 3.Rxf1 Bxa3 4.Qg4 Bd6+ 5.Kg2 Re8 > ± (1.28) Depth: 6/18 00:00:00 63kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Rxf1 3.Rxf1 Bxa3 4.Rf7 Bd6+ 5.Kg2 Re8 6.Qg4 > ± (1.31) Depth: 7/23 00:00:00 184kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Rxf1 3.Rxf1 Bxa3 4.Qg4 Bd6+ 5.Kg1 Re8 6.Rf7 > ± (1.28) Depth: 8/25 00:00:02 475kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Rxf1 3.Rxf1 Bxa3 4.Qg4 Bd6+ 5.Kg1 Re8 6.Rf7 > ± (1.22) Depth: 9/26 00:00:04 1287kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Bd6+ 3.Kg2 Rf6 4.Qg4 Qc2+ 5.Rf2 Rxf2+ > ± (1.28) Depth: 10/30 00:00:11 3480kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Bd6+ 3.Kg2 Qe4+ 4.Kg1 Rf6 5.Qh5+ Rh6 6.Qf3 > ± (1.22) Depth: 11/30 00:00:29 8990kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Bd6+ 3.Kg2 Rf6 4.Qg4 Qc2+ 5.Rf2 Rxf2+ 6.Bxf2 > ± (1.16) Depth: 12/32 00:01:09 22428kN >1...fxe6! > ± (0.84) Depth: 13/33 00:02:11 42916kN >1...fxe6! > 2 (0.53) Depth: 14/37 00:06:49 135739kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Bd6+ 3.Kg2 Qe4+ 4.Kg1 Qe5 5.Rfe1 Rf6 6.h4 > 2 (0.41) Depth: 14/39 00:09:41 194895kN >1...fxe6 2.fxe6 Bd6+ 3.Kg2 Qe4+ 4.Kg1 Qe5 5.Rfe1 Rf6 6.Qg2 > = (0.22) Depth: 15/39 00:18:58 382706kN > >Ernst-J. Very interesting. Fritz never considers e6 from the start position, looks like it gives about a 1/3 pawn less to that move, until the tactical stuff kicks in. This was from a standard game, btw, so Rebel-Tiger had enough time. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.